Independent Field Reports & Empirical Benchmarks

Field Case Studies & Architecture Benchmarks

Real-world evaluations of client-side Zero-Trust Data Sanitization (ZTDS). Discover how independent practitioners audit in-browser prompt de-identification, DOM inspection, and constant-time GDPR erasure in production AI workflows.

Field Report Revision Under Review · Europe

In-Browser Zero-Trust Data Sanitization for Commercial Workflows

Empirical enterprise workflow and regional identifier de-identification evaluation is currently undergoing peer revision and updated protocol validation.

Egress
0 Bytes
Status
In Review
Publication
Q4 2026
Available Q4 2026Under Peer Review
Architecture Benchmark Pinecone · Qdrant · pgvector

Vector Lake Ingestion & Boundary Privacy: Preserving GDPR Article 17 Erasure in Enterprise RAG

An empirical benchmark across 500,000 vector records demonstrating in-process ZTDS pre-embedding sanitization vs cloud DLP proxies, <0.065ms in-memory latency, and constant-time O(1) Right to Erasure without re-indexing vector graphs.

Latency
<0.065ms
Erasure Cost
$0.00 / O(1)
Subprocessors
0 In-Process
Ilya Sibiryakov
Privacy Architect, PrivacyScrubber
Read Case Study →
Evaluator Program

Conduct an Independent Field Evaluation

We invite CISOs, DPOs, and security engineers to evaluate our client-side zero-server engine against your synthetic enterprise datasets and regional regulatory requirements.

Request Evaluation Toolkit →
Peer-Reviewed Scientific Foundations

All field evaluations and benchmarks operate under the Zero-Trust Data Sanitization (ZTDS) protocol documented in permanent scientific publications: