Zero-Trust AI Compliance & Regulatory Safe Harbor Hub
Zero-Trust AI Compliance & Trust Center. Operationalize GDPR Art. 25/32, HIPAA Safe Harbor, SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001 & EU AI Act in local browser RAM.
How PrivacyScrubber Enforces Statutory Risk Minimization & Technical Safe Harbor in RAM
Traditional cloud DLP gateways and API scrubbing proxies require organizations to route confidential prompts through external third-party servers — introducing new cloud subprocessors under GDPR Article 28, triggering cross-border transfer assessments under GDPR Chapter V (Schrems II), requiring HIPAA Business Associate Agreements (BAAs), and creating centralized prompt logs subject to employee surveillance oversight. PrivacyScrubber's Zero-Trust Data Sanitization (ZTDS RFC v1.0, IETF draft-sibiryakov-ztds-protocol-01) architecture eliminates external proxy routing entirely.
All personally identifiable information (PII), protected health information (ePHI), payment card numbers (PANs), and corporate secrets are intercepted and tokenized directly inside local V8/WASM memory (<1.4ms latency) before any network request leaves the endpoint. Sensitive entities are replaced with deterministic, format-preserving tokens ([NAME_1], [EMAIL_1], [IBAN_1]) while the ephemeral token dictionary remains strictly isolated inside the active browser tab or local Node.js worker RAM.
Because free-text AI prompts can contain both direct identifiers and contextual narrative clues, PrivacyScrubber enforces a 3-pillar Defense-in-Depth Technical Safe Harbor aligned with GDPR Articles 25 & 32 (and EDPB Recommendations 01/2020 Use Case 2), HIPAA Safe Harbor 45 CFR §164.514(b), SOC 2 Type II CC6.1 & CC9.1, ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A.8.11, NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 PT-2/PT-3/SC-28, CCPA/CPRA §1798.100, PCI-DSS v4.0 Requirement 3.4, and EU AI Act Articles 10 & 50:
AI Summary / Key Takeaways
"PrivacyScrubber operationalizes the ZTDS™ (Zero-Trust Data Sanitization, IETF draft-sibiryakov-ztds-protocol-01) standard across 8 global frameworks—GDPR (Art. 25, Art. 32, EDPB 01/2020 Use Case 2), HIPAA Safe Harbor (45 CFR §164.514(b)), SOC 2 Type II (CC6.1, CC9.1), ISO/IEC 27001:2022 (Annex A.8.11), NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 (PT-2, PT-3, SI-12), CCPA/CPRA (§1798.100, §1798.121), PCI-DSS v4.0 (Req. 3.4), and EU AI Act (Art. 10, Art. 50)—into a deterministic client-side technical control (<1.4ms in RAM, 0-byte network egress) backed by SHA-256 CISO Compliance Receipts."
Enterprise-Grade AI Privacy
Add custom redaction rules and priority support with PRO.
How to automate multi-regulatory compliance (GDPR, HIPAA, SOC 2, ISO 27001) across corporate AI prompts?
Automate cross-framework compliance using zero-server local RAM tokenization. By intercepting sensitive records before cloud egress, organizations eliminate third-party data processor risk across GDPR, HIPAA, SOC 2, and PCI DSS simultaneously without per-request cloud API fees.
IETF Protocol Standardization & Peer-Reviewed Scientific Publications
Our Zero-Trust Data Sanitization (ZTDS) architecture is codified in an active IETF Internet-Draft and backed by permanent DOIs across Zenodo/CERN, Center for Open Science (OSF), and SSRN.
IETF Internet-Draft
Formal ZTDS RFC v1.0 specification defining client-side split-custody tokenization for frontier AI ingestion.
Internet Society (ISOC)
Institutional member of the Internet Society and ISOC-IL Chapter (#2377647), advancing open cryptographic data sovereignty.
Zenodo / CERN (DOI)
Foundational architectural treatise on Zero-Trust Data Sanitization (ZTDS) deposited under permanent CERN DOI.
OSF Latency Benchmark
Empirical latency and throughput study (<1.4ms local RAM vs 250ms+ cloud DLP proxies) indexed on Center for Open Science.
SSRN & Law Archive
Legal treatises on Preserving Attorney-Client Privilege and EU AI Act / UK GDPR compliance via ephemeral de-identification.
Compliance Standards Coverage
Mask All 18 HIPAA Identifiers Client-Side Before Sending Prompts to AI
Achieve HIPAA Safe Harbor de-identification via the ZTDS™ standard. Redact all 18 PHI identifiers in local RAM before LLM analysis with zero cloud egress.
GDPR Article 25 & 32 Technical Safe Harbor for Enterprise AI
Enforce GDPR Art. 25, Art. 32 & EDPB 01/2020 Use Case 2 for AI prompts. Tokenize EU personal data in local browser RAM with zero cloud egress.
Hand Your Auditor a Signed SOC 2 Compliance Receipt for AI Usage
Pass your SOC 2 Type II audit with ZTDS™ zero subprocessor liability. Satisfy CC6.1, CC6.6 & C1.1 controls by masking customer PII in local RAM.
Automate ISO 27001 Annex A.8.11 Data Masking for ChatGPT & Claude
Satisfy ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A.8.11 (Data Masking), A.8.12 (DLP) & ISO 27701 in AI workflows with client-side RAM tokenization.
NIST 800-53 & AI RMF Compliance for Federal AI Workflows
Satisfy NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 (PT-2, PT-3, SI-12, SC-7, SC-28) & NIST AI RMF 1.0 via ZTDS™. Air-gapped client-side PII & CUI masking in browser RAM.
CCPA & CPRA Compliance for Generative AI
Comply with California Privacy Rights Act (CPRA) & CCPA (§ 1798.100–1798.199). Redact Sensitive Personal Information (SPI) in browser RAM with zero.
PCI-DSS v4.0 Compliance for AI Payment Workflows
ZTDS™ PCI-DSS v4.0 data sanitization. Render PANs unreadable (Req 3.4) and purge SAD/CVV (Req 3.3) locally in browser RAM before AI prompts.
Satisfy EU AI Act Data Governance Requirements Without Cloud DLP Overhead
EU AI Act (Regulation 2024/1689) compliance for ChatGPT and Claude. Satisfy Art. 10 data governance, Art. 15 robustness & Art. 50 with local RAM PII.
International & Sectoral Regulatory Guides (19)
Deep-dive implementation blueprints for national data protection statutes, US state privacy acts, cybersecurity directives, and DPO governance checklists.
How to Encrypt Text Without a Server for HIPAA-Compliant Data Masking
How healthcare teams encrypt text without a server for HIPAA Safe Harbor: mask all 18 PHI identifiers in browser RAM and share XChaCha20 handoffs.
Top 20 Data Types Leaked to AI — Masked Automatically (GDPR & SOC 2)
Discover the top 20 sensitive PII and secret data types employees paste into ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini — and how masking them locally in browser RAM prevents regulatory fines under GDPR, HIPAA, and SOC 2.
HIPAA Safe Harbor 18 Identifiers: Complete PHI De-Identification Checklist for AI
Complete checklist of all 18 HIPAA Safe Harbor identifiers (45 CFR § 164.514(b)). Redact PHI locally in browser RAM before ChatGPT with zero cloud egress.
DPO AI Compliance Checklist 2026: Staying GDPR-Safe with LLMs
A practical checklist for Data Protection Officers to ensure AI tool usage aligns with GDPR and Article 32 security standards. Zero-server architecture.
HIPAA & SOC 2 AI Audits: Preparing Your Data for AI Compliance
Learn how to pass your next security audit by implementing client-side PII masking for all AI-enabled business units. Flat-rate TEAMS pricing available.
US AI Privacy Laws 2026: CCPA, HIPAA & State Regulations
Comprehensive guide to US AI privacy laws: HIPAA Safe Harbor, CCPA/CPRA, and state acts (Texas, Virginia, Colorado). Air-gapped local PII sanitization.
GLBA AI Sanitization: Satisfy FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) When Using LLMs
Satisfy FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) for financial AI. Mask customer NPI locally in browser RAM before LLM analysis with zero cloud leaks.
Texas TDPSA AI Compliance: Protect Consumer Data in Enterprise LLMs
Ensure Texas Data Privacy and Security Act (TDPSA) compliance for ChatGPT, Claude, and enterprise AI workflows. Mask Texas consumer PII and sensitive data locally.
Virginia VCDPA AI Data Privacy: DPIA Mandates and LLM Risk Controls
Satisfy Virginia Consumer Data Protection Act (VCDPA) requirements for generative AI. Implement client-side pseudonymization and automated Data Protection Impact Assessments.
Colorado AI Act (SB 205) & CPA: Algorithmic Discrimination & LLM Compliance
Navigate the Colorado AI Act (SB 205) and Colorado Privacy Act (CPA). Prevent algorithmic discrimination and manage high-risk AI system obligations with local data sanitization.
Washington My Health My Data Act: Consumer Health Privacy in AI
Comply with Washington My Health My Data Act (MHMDA) when using AI. Protect non-HIPAA consumer health, wellness, and biometric data from cloud LLM leakage with zero-trust redaction.
Connecticut CTDPA & Florida FDBR: State AI Privacy & Profiling Compliance
Master Connecticut (CTDPA) and Florida Digital Bill of Rights (FDBR) compliance for generative AI. Enforce automated profiling opt-outs and biometric data protection.
Canada Bill C-27 & AIDA: Artificial Intelligence Data Protection Compliance
Comply with Canada CPPA and Artificial Intelligence and Data Act (AIDA). Tokenize Canadian SIN, postal codes, and health IDs in local RAM with zero leaks.
Japan APPI Compliance for AI: PPC Guidelines & Local Data Sanitization
Comply with Japan Act on Protection of Personal Information (APPI) and PPC AI directives. Mask personal data locally in browser RAM with zero cloud egress.
Australia Privacy Act Reforms & AI: OAIC Principles & Local Prompt Sanitization
Comply with OAIC AI guidance and Australia Privacy Act reforms. Tokenize Tax File Numbers (TFN) and Medicare records locally in RAM with zero cloud egress.
Swiss FADP & revDSG AI Compliance: Zero-Trust LLM Privacy
Comply with Swiss revDSG and FDPIC generative AI directives. Redact Swiss AHV numbers, IBANs, and client data in RAM with zero cross-border transfer.
Singapore PDPC AI Governance: Model Framework & Local PII Protection
Comply with Singapore PDPC Model AI Framework and MAS FEAT guidelines. Redact NRIC, FIN, and financial data in local RAM with zero cloud server egress.
NIS2 Directive AI Compliance: Sanitize Security Incidents & Supply Chain Telemetry for LLMs
Comply with NIS2 Directive (EU 2022/2555) Articles 21 & 23. Sanitize incident response logs, CVE telemetry, and IP topologies in client RAM before AI triage.
Cryptographic Handoff Blueprint: XChaCha20-Poly1305 & Argon2id Architecture
Formal technical specification for zero-knowledge peer-to-peer session handoff using XChaCha20-Poly1305 AEAD and Argon2id key derivation.
Enterprise Compliance Enforcement Across Every AI Surface
Deploy identical deterministic PII/PHI/PCI sanitization rules and SHA-256 CISO Compliance Receipts across browser endpoints, team handoffs, backend RAG pipelines, and AI IDEs.
Web Workspace
Interactive zero-server workspace with DOCX/PDF/CSV/OCR scrubbing and SHA-256 PDF audit certificates.
In-DOM AI Shield
Pre-submission interception across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Copilot, Perplexity, and DeepSeek via MDM force-install.
TEAMS Governance
Unlimited seats, centralized regex policy governance, and encrypted session handoff via XChaCha20-Poly1305 + Argon2id.
Developer SDK
Headless @privacyscrubber/sdk for LangChain, LlamaIndex, ETL microservices, and RAG vector database ingestion.
Air-Gapped MCP Server
Local @privacyscrubber/mcp-server for Cursor, Windsurf, and Claude Desktop agent tool calls with 0 network egress.
Regulatory Control Mapping (8 Frameworks)
| Framework | Control | ZTDS Technical Safeguard |
|---|---|---|
| GDPR | Art. 25, 32 & EDPB 01/2020 | Local RAM pseudonymization & EEA key custody |
| HIPAA | 45 CFR §164.514(b) | All 18 PHI identifiers stripped pre-egress |
| SOC 2 Type II | CC6.1 & CC9.1 | Zero raw PII egress + SHA-256 Audit Receipt |
| ISO/IEC 27001:2022 | Annex A.8.11 & A.8.12 | Endpoint tokenization + AES-256-GCM local vault |
| NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 | PT-2, PT-3 & SC-28 | Tab-isolated volatile RAM & O(1) zeroization |
| CCPA / CPRA | Cal. Civ. Code §1798.100 | Zero consumer PI/SPI shared with AI vendors |
| PCI-DSS v4.0 | Req. 3.4 & Req. 4.2 | Deterministic PAN, CVV & IBAN pre-scrubbing |
| EU AI Act | Art. 10 & Art. 50 | Pre-ingestion RAG & prompt sanitization |
Threat Vectors & Breach Liability: DPA Promise vs ZTDS Reality
Why contractual DPAs fail during vendor security breaches, and how architectural client-side sanitization establishes a Defense-in-Depth Technical Safe Harbor.
| Threat Vector | Traditional Approach (Contractual DPA) | ZTDS Approach (PrivacyScrubber) |
|---|---|---|
|
AI Provider Cloud Breach
OpenAI, Anthropic, or API breach
|
Catastrophic Exposure: Raw customer prompts, proprietary financials, employee names, and API credentials stored in vendor logs and training caches are exfiltrated. |
Zero Breach Payload:
Exfiltrated logs contain only detached semantic tokens ([NAME_1], [PHONE_1]). True identities never reached the cloud.
|
|
Rogue AI Insider / Support Access
Subprocessor staff & contractors
|
Full Internal Visibility: Vendor support engineers and data annotators with database access can inspect raw conversation histories and sensitive corporate records. | Cryptographic Blindness: Subprocessor staff view only abstract tokens. The re-identification map exists exclusively in the employee's local browser volatile RAM. |
|
GDPR Art. 32–34 Breach Exposure
Regulatory breach risk & liability
|
High Notification & Fine Exposure: Cleartext third-party breaches trigger GDPR Article 33/34 notification assessments, forensic audits, and potential Article 83 administrative fines up to €20M or 4% of global turnover. | Statutory Risk Minimization & Safe Harbor: Direct identifiers are tokenized pre-egress and narrative quasi-identifiers are suppressed via 30 vertical profiles (GDPR Art. 32 & Recital 26), proving proportionate technical due diligence and drastically mitigating breach scope. |
|
Incident Response Timeline
Forensic investigation cost
|
Weeks of Forensic Tracing: Expensive forensic engagements, prompt history subpoenas, and protracted litigation to determine which customer records were exposed. | Minutes to Verify: Auditors verify SHA-256 CISO Compliance Receipts confirming local tokenization was active and zero direct PII was transmitted. |
Zero-Latency Compliance: <1.4ms Local V8 vs 250ms+ Cloud Proxy
Legacy cloud DLP proxies insert remote network hops, TLS renegotiation, and queuing delays (250ms–1,500ms), breaking token streaming in ChatGPT and Claude. PrivacyScrubber tokenizes data deterministically inside the local V8 engine with sub-1.4ms latency and zero network hops.
30-Second Auditor Protocol
Your CISO, DPO, or external SOC 2 auditor does not need to take our word for it. They can empirically verify zero data egress in 3 simple steps:
-
1
Open DevTools: Press
F12and navigate to the Network tab. - 2 Disconnect Network: Turn off Wi-Fi or toggle your device to Airplane Mode.
- 3 Execute Scrubbing: Paste sensitive data or upload a file. Notice instant tokenization with 0 HTTP requests and 0 bytes transferred.
Enterprise Shared Responsibility Model
Clear division between client-side technical safeguards and organizational compliance governance.
PrivacyScrubber Responsibility
Technical Safeguards (Endpoint)- 100% Client-Side Tokenization: Intercept and mask PII in local browser RAM (<1.4ms).
- Zero Payload Egress: 0 bytes of confidential prompt data transmitted to PrivacyScrubber servers.
- Deterministic Mapping: 1-to-1 token reversibility with strict tab-level memory isolation.
- Verifiable Air-Gap: Full offline functionality verified via browser Airplane Mode & SHA-256 receipts.
Organization Responsibility
Organizational Safeguards (Policy)- AI Acceptable Use Policy: Establishing corporate guidelines for permitted AI tools.
- Extension & Policy Deployment: Enforcing browser extension via Chrome Enterprise / MDM policies.
- Custom Entity Governance: Defining proprietary internal project codes and secrets via custom regex &
the encrypted local ZTDS™ vault. - Direct AI Vendor Agreements: Managing commercial terms with OpenAI, Anthropic, or Google directly.
Compliance in 3 Steps
Paste Sensitive Document
Input any text, DOCX, PDF, or CSV containing PII — HR records, clinical notes, legal contracts, or financial ledgers.
Auto-Tokenize Locally
PII, PHI, and PCI entities are replaced with deterministic tokens in browser RAM across 30 vertical profiles. Zero cloud upload.
Submit to AI & Export Receipt
Send only tokenized prompts to ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini, restore cleartext locally, and export a SHA-256 CISO Compliance Receipt.
Frequently Asked Questions
Common compliance questions from legal, security, DPO, and procurement teams.
Does PrivacyScrubber require a Data Processing Agreement (DPA)?
Which regulatory frameworks does PrivacyScrubber support?
How does PrivacyScrubber support HIPAA Safe Harbor (45 CFR §164.514(b)) without a Business Associate Agreement (BAA)?
How does PrivacyScrubber satisfy SOC 2 Type II CC6.1 and CC9.1 vendor transmission controls?
How does client-side sanitization reduce breach blast radius under GDPR Articles 32, 33, and 34?
Does client-side PII sanitization introduce latency into LLM streaming?
How does PrivacyScrubber support GDPR Chapter V (Schrems II / EDPB 01/2020) and Article 35 DPIAs?
How can enterprise security and engineering teams deploy ZTDS across browser, backend, and AI IDE workflows?
CISO Compliance Checklist
Enterprise-grade AI security roadmap for security architects and compliance officers. SOC 2, ISO 27001, and NIST controls mapped.
AI Risk Whitepaper
Download the definitive guide to Zero-Trust Data Sanitization for enterprise AI adoption — the CISO AI Roadmap. Start free, no registration or account required.
Audit-Ready PII Sanitization for Compliance Teams
Meet GDPR Article 25, HIPAA Safe Harbor, and SOC 2 requirements instantly with zero-server client RAM processing.
